Archives for category: Politics

Fordham law professor and rising political star Zephyr Teachout is considering a run for Congress this year. Ms. Teachout moved to the 19th Congressional District about a year ago. Her candidacy would give Democrats a strong contender against a mediocre Republican field.

Zephyr Teachout
Zephyr Teachout for Congress. Photo: Wikipedia.

The idea of a John Faso or Pete Lopez succeeding Chris Gibson is depressing, as it would consign this area to continued backwardness for at least the length of the new Congressperson’s term. Teachout would be a refreshing and positive alternative: her experience, ambition, training and smarts could help begin to turn our area around.

We very much hope Ms. Teachout decides to run.

I received a cheaply produced political flyer in the mail the other day—it was from Pete Lopez, getting an early start on next year’s Congressional election. The issue Lopez chose to highlight? Broadband and the lack thereof.

Ordinarily it would be a good thing to have a politico emphasize the need for broadband in our area and vow to help bring us up to speed. But Lopez is following in the footsteps of Chris Gibson, another politician who claimed for years to recognize the importance of broadband to this area and did fuck-all to make it a reality. This just seems like more of the same.

Pete Lopez
Pete Lopez: we need more broadband.

Lopez says he is counting on $500 million in state money to expand high-speed broadband to underserved areas. He says “a high priority for me will be to use these funds to build new Internet lines that would effectively serve our rural communities.” But he does not explain how he will achieve this. How, for example, will he persuade Mid-Hudson Cable to accept government funding to expand its service when it has rejected such funding in the past?

The question is of more than academic interest. Greene County ranks last in New York State in broadband availability, and the service it does have is arguably sub-standard.

Fortunately, another New York politician is on the case—New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman. His office is investigating whether current broadband providers are actually delivering the speeds they promise. (Spoiler: in many cases, they’re not.) You can help hold your provider accountable by going to this page, filling out the form, taking the broadband speed test at http://internethealthtest.org and attaching a screenshot of your test results to the form you submit to the AG’s office.

My provider is Mid-Hudson Cable, and according to the test I am receiving less than half the speed I’m paying for.

I’d like to see someone do something about that, and with luck someone will. But it’s likely to be the Attorney General’s office, not Pete Lopez.

For those who may have missed it, the New York Times is running an editorial on its front page this morning. It is the first time the paper has done so since 1920. The editorial’s subject is of overwhelming importance in today’s America: the need for rational gun control. Here is the editorial in its entirety.

End the Gun Epidemic in America

​It is a moral outrage and national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency.

By THE EDITORIAL BOARD

All decent people feel sorrow and righteous fury about the latest slaughter of innocents, in California. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies are searching for motivations, including the vital question of how the murderers might have been connected to international terrorism. That is right and proper.

But motives do not matter to the dead in California, nor did they in Colorado, Oregon, South Carolina, Virginia, Connecticut and far too many other places. The attention and anger of Americans should also be directed at the elected leaders whose job is to keep us safe but who place a higher premium on the money and political power of an industry dedicated to profiting from the unfettered spread of ever more powerful firearms.

It is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency. These are weapons of war, barely modified and deliberately marketed as tools of macho vigilantism and even insurrection. America’s elected leaders offer prayers for gun victims and then, callously and without fear of consequence, reject the most basic restrictions on weapons of mass killing, as they did on Thursday. They distract us with arguments about the word terrorism. Let’s be clear: These spree killings are all, in their own ways, acts of terrorism.

Opponents of gun control are saying, as they do after every killing, that no law can unfailingly forestall a specific criminal. That is true. They are talking, many with sincerity, about the constitutional challenges to effective gun regulation. Those challenges exist. They point out that determined killers obtained weapons illegally in places like France, England and Norway that have strict gun laws. Yes, they did.

But at least those countries are trying. The United States is not. Worse, politicians abet would-be killers by creating gun markets for them, and voters allow those politicians to keep their jobs. It is past time to stop talking about halting the spread of firearms, and instead to reduce their number drastically — eliminating some large categories of weapons and ammunition.

It is not necessary to debate the peculiar wording of the Second Amendment. No right is unlimited and immune from reasonable regulation.

Certain kinds of weapons, like the slightly modified combat rifles used in California, and certain kinds of ammunition, must be outlawed for civilian ownership. It is possible to define those guns in a clear and effective way and, yes, it would require Americans who own those kinds of weapons to give them up for the good of their fellow citizens.

What better time than during a presidential election to show, at long last, that our nation has retained its sense of decency?

As Greene County’s largest city, Catskill should pave the way toward progress. The slate of Democratic candidates representing Catskill in tomorrow’s election are in a position to do exactly that.

Let’s start with Doreen Davis, who is running for Catskill Town Supervisor against incumbent Joseph Leggio. Doreen has done a terrific job as the Greene County Democratic Committee Chair, infusing new energy and commitment into the party at the local level. Her extensive Fortune 100 managerial experience and her ideas for improving economic development, citizen participation and digital infrastructure are far superior to anything her opponent can offer. She would be a superb supervisor.

Elect Doreen Davis Town Supervisor
Elect Doreen Davis Catskill Town Supervisor. Photo: Beth Schneck.

Doreen’s husband Crane Davis is a sterling candidate in his own right. A decorated Vietnam veteran (Bronze Star, Purple Heart), Crane is a communications professional—former Time Magazine correspondent and producer and host on Channel 13, WNET in New York— who also has extensive, high-level marketing and consulting expertise. He would be an outstanding asset for the city and county alike.

Elect Crane Davis to the County Legislature
Elect Crane Davis to the County Legislature. Photo: Beth Schneck.

The Davises aren’t the only highly qualified candidates running in Catskill, of course. Kevin Lennon, Joe Kozloski and Vinny Seeley are also running for the Greene County Legislature from District 1, alongside Crane Davis. Pat McCulloch is running for Town Councilman.

Help build a better Catskill: vote Democratic on Tuesday, November 3.

Last night, Lori Torgersen, the Democratic candidate for the County Legislature representing Windham, Ashland, Jewett and Prattsville, made some brief remarks at Fitness Concepts in Hensonville. She was articulate and persuasive and would clearly be a strong asset for her district in the legislature.

Lori Torgersen
Lori Torgersen. Photo: tpletcher.

Torgersen is bright, energetic and accomplished—she is especially well-regarded for her work (she was a co-founder) with the Windham Area Recreation Foundation (WARF).

From Torgersen’s website:

WARF is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization dedicated to establishing the Windham region as a preeminent four-season destination and bettering the lives of its residents and visitors through the enhancement of trail-based recreation opportunities. WARF’s accomplishments include bringing the UCI Mountain Bike World Cup to Windham for five of the last six years and building the extremely popular multi-use Windham Path. Perhaps most importantly, WARF raised over $200,000 in the aftermath of Hurricane Irene and devised a system to fairly and efficiently distribute the funds to businesses and individuals in need.

In addition, Ms. Torgersen cited two of Greene County’s longterm quality-of-life weaknesses and its subsequent lowly ranking within NY State: healthcare and broadband. She would like the county to fare better in both, and to do a better job of advocating for women’s interests as well.

If you missed Lori last night, you’ll have a chance to see and hear her tomorrow (Sunday, Oct. 25) at the Country Suite B & B from 2 to 4.

Vote Torgersen on November 3. She would help move Windham and Greene County forward.

Pete Lopez is officially running for Congress. He’ll be running against ex-Assembly Leader John Faso, who was once his boss, and Dutchess County businessman Andrew Heaney in the Republican and Conservative party primaries next year. The identity of his Democratic opponent next November (assuming he can vanquish Faso and Heaney) is still to be determined.

“I see myself as a neighbor,” Lopez said in announcing, and indeed he comports himself that way. The problem, as I’ve noted before, is that behind Lopez’s friendly demeanor resides a far-right ideologue who would represent a step backward from the retiring Chris Gibson. There is also the question of whether Lopez is genuinely qualified to be in Congress, even though that bar is set very low these days.

All politics may be local, as Tip O’Neill famously said, but that doesn’t mean that local elections necessarily amount to much. What O’Neill meant is that people tend to vote in their own narrow self-interest in local elections. Soaring rhetoric and grand principles seem to count for more in national elections, though even then voters seem to translate these in terms of their own political affiliations and belief systems. Especially now, when the country is so starkly divided.

Local elections have not changed much in Greene County in recent years. (National elections have not changed much in Greene County, either.) The county continues to lag statewide in many important areas, including education, health care and economic opportunity. Local officials nominally in charge of improving the situation have been a joke, and that’s phrasing it kindly.

Do local elections matter? Here in Greene County, not usually. But they could matter, with the right candidate(s).


Democratic Greene County Legislature candidates. Photo: Beth Schneck Photography.

There’s an election coming up in a few weeks—on Nov. 3—and a lot of new Democratic faces are in the mix. Let’s look at some of them.

Lori Torgersen is running to represent Windham, Ashland, Jewett and Prattsville in the county legislature. How would she make a difference? Her vision includes pursuing state, federal and private funding for important projects, including broadbrand, and working as an advocate for women’s interests. She has played a role in developing the Windham Path and organizing the Mountain Bike World Cup races in Windham. Almost everyone likes the former; some people question how much the latter does for the overall area economy, in part because it overlaps with her husband Nick Bove’s business interests. Still, Torgerson is saying a lot of the right things.

Aidan O’Connor, Jr. is running to represent Durham in the county legislature. O’Connor is a young paramedic who has extensive experience with Greene County Emergency Medical Systems and he is a driving force in the attempt to implement a coordinated, countywide ambulance service. God knows that’s something the county sorely needs.

Crane Davis is running to represent Catskill in the county legislature. Crane is Princeton-educated and a gifted communicator with political experience; he would seem to be an asset for Catskill.

Finally, Doreen Parsley Davis (who is Crane’s spouse and also the Greene County Democratic Committee Chair) is running for Catskill Town Supervisor. Doreen is a skilled political operative with extensive experience in managing large teams and budgets for Merck, a Fortune 100 company. Again, this sounds like experience Catskill could use.

Do local elections matter? This time, maybe so.

This post is for the gun-loving, Second Amendment-cheering, Red State/redneck half of the American public (and the majority of Greene and Columbia County residents who proudly vote Tea Party Republican).

There’s been another mass shooting, this time at a community college in Oregon. Ten dead, no big deal. Watch the liberals come out and wring their scrawny hands and cry and whine for gun control. Predictable, right?

Why don’t those leftists get it? Why can’t they see all this complaining about all the guns out there only masks the real solution to this problem? Which is, of course, that we need more guns and no restrictions on them. If even one of those community college students out in Oregon had been armed, chances are this latest incident wouldn’t even have happened? Right? Right?

Oregon community college mass shooting
Captions by New York Times, aerial photos by Google Earth.

All right, fucktards, enough of your point of view. Picture this: you’re having breakfast with your buds at your favorite spot in Hudson or Catskill or Tannersville or Windham. In walks a pissed-off progressive with an AR-15. “Here’s a tea party for you,” he says and opens fire. You die with a mouthful of bacon and eggs.

Assuming your imagination stretches that far, how would you address a situation such as the above? Would you:

A) Start taking your AR-15 every place you go, including breakfast?
B) Lobby for a change in gun registration laws to prevent any Democrat from owning a firearm?
C) Loudly proclaim that the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun?

You’re probably thinking that my hypothetical scenario is ridiculous, because no liberal would have the balls to bring a rifle into a gathering of country Republicans at breakfast. The truth is that most progressives don’t even own a gun, and that is by choice.

But you’re crazy if you think the current state of affairs will last forever. As more and more Americans die by gun violence, and more and more family members and friends are devastated by their deaths, things will start to change.

One way or another, eventually the number of guns in “private” hands will shrink dramatically.

By ballot or bullet, as you like to say.

Former state Assembly Minority Leader John Faso, a Republican who said he was forming an “exploratory committee” last month, seems on the verge of formally announcing his candidacy for the 19th Congressional District. That, at least, is the strong impression given by a new johnfaso.com website, especially its “About” page.


The Fasos. Photo: johnfaso.com.

In the aforementioned About page, Faso says “A lot of us are left wondering if our children will have the same chances we did to live here in Upstate New York, start a career and raise a family of their own.”

I want to work to change that, he says.

How? By talking about broadband for years while doing nothing, like Chris Gibson? By doing nothing to improve rural education or medical access? By maintaining the stagnant upstate status quo, which seems to be the modus operandi of both political parties?

And speaking of both political parties, where are the Democratic candidates? So far we have John Patrick Kehoe, of Rochester—not a great start.

Is there no one who actually lives in the 19th Congressional District capable of running a compelling, charismatic, progressive campaign?

In the midst of America’s gun carnage, a new Democratic candidate came forward this week to announce his intention to run in our 19th Congressional District next year. His name: John Patrick Kehoe, the chief of Yellowcake Music. There may be a slight problem, though: Kehoe’s own press release says he lives in Rochester, some three hours away.


John Patrick Kehoe, of Rochester or Woodstock.

If there’s one thing we don’t need, it’s another young would-be Congressperson from outside our district. Especially when the semi-likable Chris Gibson will be removed from the equation in 2016.

Not to worry, though: the Democracy.com site says Kehoe actually lives in Woodstock, and in fact Yellowcake Music’s Facebook page says the organization has offices in Rochester and Woodstock. If Kehoe actually can demonstrate residency in Ulster County then it’s all good.

Still, it would be nice to have someone who’s definitively, 100% local step up to fight off the pro-gun, anti-progress likes of John Faso or Pete Lopez next year.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 66 other followers